|
The
incumbent of the Oriental Chair has powers peculiar to his station; powers
far greater than those of the President of a society or the Chairman of a
meeting of any kind. President and Chairman are elected by the body over
which they preside, and may be removed by that body. A Master is elected
by his lodge, but cannot be removed by it; only by the Grand Master or
Grand Lodge. The presiding officer is bound by the rules of order adopted
by the body and by its by-laws are subject to approval by the proper Grand
Lodge Committee or by the Grand Master; seldom are any approved which
infringe upon his ancient prerogatives and powers; in those few instances
in which improper by-laws have been approved, subsequent rulings have
often declared the Master right in disregarding them.
Grand Lodges differ in their interpretation of some of the "ancient usages
and customs" of the Fraternity; what applies in one jurisdiction does not
necessarily apply in another. But certain powers of a Master are so well
recognized that they may be considered universal. The occasional
exceptions, if anybut prove the rule.
The Master may congregate his lodge when he pleases, and for what purpose
he wishes, provided it does not interfere with the laws of the Grand
Lodge:
For instance, he may assemble his lodge at a Special Communication to
confer degrees, at his pleasure; but he must not, in so doing, contravene
that requirement of the Grand Lodge which calls for proper notice to the
brethren, nor may a Master confer a degree in less than the statutory time
following a preceding degree without a dispensation from the Grand Master.
The Master has the right of presiding over and controlling his lodge, and
only the Grand Master or his Deputy may suspend him. He may put any
brother in the East to preside or to confer a degree; he may then resume
the gavel at his pleasure, even in the middle of a sentence if he wants
to! But even when he has delegated authority temporarily the Master is not
relieved from responsibility for what occurs in his lodge. It is the
Master's right to control lodge business and work. It is in a very real
sense his lodge. He decides all points of order and no appeal from his
decision may be taken to the lodge. He can initiate and terminate debate
at his pleasure, he can second any motion, propose any motion, vote twice
in case of a tie (not universal), open and close at his pleasure, with the
usual exception that he may not open a Special Communication at an hour
earlier than that given in the notice, or a Stated Communication earlier
than the hour stated in the by-laws, without dispensation from the Grand
Master. He is responsible only to the Grand Master and the Grand Ldoge,
the obligations he assumed when he was installed, his conscience and his
God.
The Master has the undoubted right to say who shall enter, and who must
leave, the lodge room. He may deny any visitor entrance; indeed, he may
deny a member the right to his own lodge, but he must have a good and
sufficient reason therefore, otherwise his Grand Lodge will unquestionably
rule such a drastic step arbitrary and punish accordingly. Per contra, if
he permits the entry of a visitor to whom some member has objected, he may
also subject himself to Grand Lodge discipline. In other words, his power
to admit or exclude is absolute; his right to admit or exclude is hedged
about by the pledges he takes at his installation and the rules of his
Grand Lodge.
A very important power of a Master is that of appointing committees. No
lodge may appoint a committee. The lodge may Pass a resolution that a
committee be appointed, but the selection of that committee is an inherent
right of the Master. He is, ex officio, a member of all committees he
appoints. The reason is obvious; he is responsible for the conduct of his
lodge to the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge. If the lodge could appoint
committees and act upon their recommendations, the Master would be in the
anomalous position of having great responsibilities, and no power to carry
out their performance.
The Master, and only the Master, may order a committee to examine a
visiting brother. It is his responsibility to see that no Cowan or
Eavesdropper comes within the tiled door. Therefore, it is for him to pick
a committee in which he has confidence. So, also, with the committees
which report upon petitioners. He is responsible for the accuracy, the
fair-mindedness, the speed and the intelligence of such investigations. It
is, therefore, for him to say to whom shall be delegated this necessary
and important work.
It is generally, not exclusively, held that only the Master can issue a
summons. The dispute, where it exists, is over the right of members
present at a stated communication to summons the whole membership.
It may now be interesting to look for a moment at some matters in which the
Worshipful Master is not supreme, and catalog a few things he may not do.
The Master, and only the Master, appoints the appointive officers in his
lodge. In most juris-dictions, he may remove such appointed officers at
his pleasure. But he cannot suspend, or deprive of his station or place,
any officer elected by the lodge. The Grand Master or his Deputy may do
this; the Worshipful Master may not.
A Master may not spend lodge money without the consent of the lodge. As a
matter of convenience, a Master frequently does pay out money in sudden
emergencies, looking to the lodge to reimburse him. But he cannot spend
any lodge funds without the permission of the lodge.
A Master cannot accept a petition or confer a degree without the consent
of the lodge. It is for the lodge, not the Master, to say from what men it
will receive an application, upon what candidates degrees shall be
conferred. The Master has the same power to reject with the black ball
that is possessed by any member, but no power whatever to accept any
candidate against the will of the lodge.
The lodge, not the Master, must approve or disapprove the minutes of the
preceding meeting. The Master cannot approve them; had he that power he
might, with the conninance of the Secretary, "run wild" in his lodge and
still his minutes would show no trace of his improper conduct. But the
Master may refuse to put a motion to confirm or approve minutes which he
believes to be inaccurate or incomplete; in this way lie can prevent a
careless, headstrong Secretary from doing what he wants with his minutes!
Should a Master refuse to permit minutes to be confirmed, the matter would
naturally be brought before Grand Lodge or the Grand Master for
settlement.
A Master cannot suspend the by-laws. He must not permit the lodge to
suspend the by-laws. If the lodge wishes to change them, the means are
available, not in suspension but in amendment.
An odd exception may be noted, which has occurred in at least one Grand
Jurisdiction and doubtless may occur in others. A very old lodge adopted
by-laws shortly after it was constituted, which by-laws were approved by a
young Grand Lodge before that body had, apparently, devoted much attention
to these important rules.
For many years this lodge carried in its by-laws an "order of business"
which specified, among other things, that following the reading of the
minutes, the next business was balloting. As the time of meeting of this
lodge was early (seven o'clock) this by-law worked a hardship for years,
compelling brethren who wished to vote to hurry to lodge, often at great
inconvenience.
At last a Master was elected who saw that the by-law interfered with his
right to conduct the business of the lodge as he thought proper. He
balloted at what he thought the proper time; the last order of business,
not the first. An indignant committee of Past Masters, who preferred the
old order, applied to the Grand Master for relief. The Grand Master
promptly ruled that "order of business" in the by-laws could be no more
than suggestive, not mandatory; and that the Worshipful Master had power
to order a ballot on a petition at the hour which seemed to him wise,
provided--and this was stressed--that he ruled wisely, and did not
postpone a ballot until after a degree, or until so late in the evening
that brethren wishing to vote upon it had left the lodge room
A Worshipful Master has no more right to invade the privacy which shrouds
the use of the black ball, or which conceals the reason for an objection
to an elected candidate receiving the degrees, than the humblest member of
the lodge. He cannot demand disclosure of action or motive from any
brother, and should he do so, he would be subject to the severest
discipline from Grand Lodge. Grand Lodges usually argue that a dereliction
of duty by a brother who possesses the ability and character to attain the
East, is great privileges, enjoys great prerogatives and powers. Therefore,
he must measure up to great responsibilities.
A Worshipful Master cannot resign. Vacancies occur in the East through
death, suspension by a Grand Master, expulsion from the Fraternity. No
power can make a Master attend to his duties if he desires to neglect
them. If he will not, or does not, attend to them, the Senior Warden
presides. He is, however, still Senior Warden; he does not become Master
until elected and installed.
In broad outline, these are the important and principal powers and
responsibilities of a Worshipful Master, considered entirely from the
standpoint of the "ancient usages and customs of the Craft." Nothing is
here said of the moral and spiritual duties which devolve upon a Master.
Volumes might be and some have been written upon how a Worshipful Master
should preside, in what ways he can "give the brethren good and wholesome
instruction, "and upon his undoubted moral responsibility to do his best
to leave his lodge better than he found it. Here we are concerned only
with the legal aspect of his powers and duties.
Briefly, then, if he keeps within the laws, resolutions and edicts of his
Grand Lodge on the one hand, and the Landmarks, Old Charges, Constitutions
and "ancient usages and customs" on the other, the power of the Worshipful
Master is that of an absolute monarch. His responsibilities and his,
duties are those of an apostle of Light!
He is a gifted brother who can fully measure up to the use of his power
and the power of his leadership. |